He had apparently been seen on set and now it has been confirmed. Liam Neeson will reprise his role as Ra's Al Ghul in The Dark Knight Rises. It's listed as a cameo so he probably won't appear for too long.
Does this surprise me? No.
Does this excite me? Meh. Batman Begins is my least favorite of the Nolan films so far.
Are you excited?
http://collider.com/dark-knight-rises-batman-begins-cameo/155661/
Movie news, movie reviews, and basically whatever else I want to talk about. Come on in and join the party.
The past seven days
-
After their victory in the 74th Hunger Games sparks a rebellion across the districts of Panem, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark return to ...
-
Fifty Shades of Grey fans are causing quite the ruckus in regards to the casting of Charlie Hunnam and Dakota Johnson as Christian Grey and...
-
Did you know that 29 of the film releases slated for 2013 are either a sequel or a prequel to a previous film? Believe it because it's c...
Showing posts with label Cameo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cameo. Show all posts
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Spiderman to have a cameo in The Avengers?
Speaking of The Avengers, apparently some council member named Jenny Agutter leaked that there was going to be a cameo from Spiderman in the film.
Personally I don't want that for the sheer fact that it will, no doubt, be Andrew Garfield because he is technically the new Spiderman. I think if this is true it is nothing but a cheap advertising stunt to promote The Amazing Spiderman which isn't even the same studio. The Avengers was put on by Paramount Pictures while The Amazing Spiderman belongs to Sony Pictures. The only thing they have in common is Marvel which is now, unfortunately, controlled by Disney. I love Disney but they will capitalize on anything by any means necessary.
What do you think? Yes or no? If it's even true, that is.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/Thorverine/news/?a=53258
Personally I don't want that for the sheer fact that it will, no doubt, be Andrew Garfield because he is technically the new Spiderman. I think if this is true it is nothing but a cheap advertising stunt to promote The Amazing Spiderman which isn't even the same studio. The Avengers was put on by Paramount Pictures while The Amazing Spiderman belongs to Sony Pictures. The only thing they have in common is Marvel which is now, unfortunately, controlled by Disney. I love Disney but they will capitalize on anything by any means necessary.
What do you think? Yes or no? If it's even true, that is.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/Thorverine/news/?a=53258
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)