Leonard Nimoy, most famous for his role as Spock in Star Trek, has died at the age of 83. Nimoy was hospitalized earlier this week with chest pains due to end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Along with his TV and film fame from the Star Trek franchise, Nimoy was an author and photographer. He published several books throughout the years and even delved into directing as he directed Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home.
Rest in peace, good sir. You have indeed lived long and prospered.
Movie news, movie reviews, and basically whatever else I want to talk about. Come on in and join the party.
The past seven days
-
After their victory in the 74th Hunger Games sparks a rebellion across the districts of Panem, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark return to ...
-
I will admit I hadn't heard a thing about the new Summit Entertainment zombie film, Warm Bodies, until this morning. It is set to hit th...
-
Fifty Shades of Grey follows a young college student named Anastasia Steele as she enters an unknown world of sexual and emotional discover...
-
Despite the tragedy here in Colorado I still went out to a different theater last night and saw the much anticipated finale to Christopher N...
Showing posts with label Star Trek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Star Trek. Show all posts
Friday, February 27, 2015
Monday, July 22, 2013
[Updated] J.J. Abrams dropping out of Star Wars Episode VII?
According to the internet there are various sources suggesting J.J. Abrams is close to dropping out of Star Wars: Episode VII.
You may be aware that it was recently announced filming would begin soon as the production has already moved to London, England to make the 2015 release. A move that Abrams protested severely, but in the end he was overruled by the studio. According to sources the location isn't the only disagreement Abrams has had with the studio.
It is suggested that if Abrams is truly dropping out of the director's chair it will become apparent at the upcoming Star Wars Celebration held in Germany from July 26th to the 28th. Either that or if there is no mention of Episode VII whatsoever.
This all comes after news that new writers are being sought after in for the third Star Trek film. Ashley Edward Miller and Zack Stentz (Thor, X-Men: First Class) are reportedly close to a done deal to write the third Star Trek and many feel this is also leading toward Abrams committing to direct the third installment. That is if he leaves Disney high and dry and drops out of Episode VII. Not to mention Miller and Stentz are part of Abrams' Bad Robot family, so if he is considering it the move back to Star Trek is very likely. This has to move fast if Star Trek 3 is going to make the 2016 release date Paramount wants so they can use the film as promotion for Star Trek's 50th anniversary.
You might have asked the same question I did... how can J.J. Abrams realistically direct both projects? As of right now there really is no answer to that. It is likely that Abrams will have to pass on one of them. However, if he chooses to leave Episode VII that doesn't necessarily mean he will automatically choose to direct Star Trek. He is a pretty in-demand guy right now so I'm sure he has plenty of potential projects to choose from.
I will definitely be watching this one closely. I wasn't too psyched they chose Abrams for Episode VII, but I'm sure I could tolerate what he would produce. If he drops out and they try to fast track a director to still make the 2015 release, which I'm sure they would, I fear who they would choose. I highly doubt they can do any better than J.J. Abrams with the available choices.
[UPDATE] Apparently this is just what it started as. It's a rumor. A rep for Lucasfilm stated there is no truth to the rumor and that Abrams is looking forward to production. Whether that was just them trying to do some damage control to diffuse the rumor before it gets too big remains to be seen.
#StarWars #EpisodeVII #JJAbrams
You may be aware that it was recently announced filming would begin soon as the production has already moved to London, England to make the 2015 release. A move that Abrams protested severely, but in the end he was overruled by the studio. According to sources the location isn't the only disagreement Abrams has had with the studio.
It is suggested that if Abrams is truly dropping out of the director's chair it will become apparent at the upcoming Star Wars Celebration held in Germany from July 26th to the 28th. Either that or if there is no mention of Episode VII whatsoever.
This all comes after news that new writers are being sought after in for the third Star Trek film. Ashley Edward Miller and Zack Stentz (Thor, X-Men: First Class) are reportedly close to a done deal to write the third Star Trek and many feel this is also leading toward Abrams committing to direct the third installment. That is if he leaves Disney high and dry and drops out of Episode VII. Not to mention Miller and Stentz are part of Abrams' Bad Robot family, so if he is considering it the move back to Star Trek is very likely. This has to move fast if Star Trek 3 is going to make the 2016 release date Paramount wants so they can use the film as promotion for Star Trek's 50th anniversary.
You might have asked the same question I did... how can J.J. Abrams realistically direct both projects? As of right now there really is no answer to that. It is likely that Abrams will have to pass on one of them. However, if he chooses to leave Episode VII that doesn't necessarily mean he will automatically choose to direct Star Trek. He is a pretty in-demand guy right now so I'm sure he has plenty of potential projects to choose from.
I will definitely be watching this one closely. I wasn't too psyched they chose Abrams for Episode VII, but I'm sure I could tolerate what he would produce. If he drops out and they try to fast track a director to still make the 2015 release, which I'm sure they would, I fear who they would choose. I highly doubt they can do any better than J.J. Abrams with the available choices.
[UPDATE] Apparently this is just what it started as. It's a rumor. A rep for Lucasfilm stated there is no truth to the rumor and that Abrams is looking forward to production. Whether that was just them trying to do some damage control to diffuse the rumor before it gets too big remains to be seen.
#StarWars #EpisodeVII #JJAbrams
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Star Trek Into Darkness - Review
Star Trek Into Darkness follows Captain Kirk and the crew of the USS Enterprise as they go on a manhunt for one-man weapon of mass destruction named John Harrison. Little to they know that the problem may not just lie with John Harrison, but with Starfleet itself.
I was excited for Star Trek Into Darkness, despite the dumb title, for the sheer fact that I have grown up watching Star Trek. I wouldn't describe myself as a "trekkie" but I do know the storylines and have seen just about every TV show and movie thanks to my father. I also really enjoyed J.J. Abrams' first Star Trek film back in 2009. I chose to avoid a majority of trailers and teasers for the sheer fact that buzz about the plot and characters started very early. There were rumors circulating about exactly who John Harrison was starting directly after the Super Bowl teaser if I remember correctly. I just didn't want the crap so I chose to stay away from it the best I could. This is one case where I am happy I did because from the trailers I did see, they focus on the first half hour or so of the movie and ignore the best parts and I loved that.
And just to say, this will have spoilers so beware. The big reveal of who John Harrison is was in the trailer and people called it, but you might want to skip this if you haven't seen Star Trek Into Darkness yet.
So in case you know nothing about Star Trek, didn't catch it in the trailer, or whatever else... John Harrison is Khan.
In case you didn't know or need some catch up, Khan is a genetically engineered tyrant who escaped a 15-year exile by Captain Kirk and returned to seek revenge. The history according to Star Trek Into Darkness is he was the leader of a genetically altered race who tried to conquer Earth and wipe out whoever they deemed inferior. The plot of the 1982 film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan basically followed the USS Enterprise in an attempt to stop Khan from acquiring Genesis, a powerful terraforming device. The Wrath of Khan is generally referred to as the best of the Star Trek films and is credited with renewing interest in the Star Trek story after a lackluster Star Trek motion picture in 1979.
Now back to business... This story arc for Star Trek Into Darkness is a bit confusing and I had to talk to my dad after the movie was over. It basically takes you before the "Space Seed" episode where Khan first appeared or just shifts into an alternate Star Trek universe and replaced "Space Seed."
Basically we start as Captain Kirk is relieved of his duties as Captain of the USS Enterprise after compromising Spock's life and defying Starfleet protocols. After an attack on a Starfleet archives building in London, Kirk is shifted to Captain Pike's command as First Officer of the Enterprise and Spock was ordered as First Officer to another ship. While in a meeting in San Francisco, the fugitive known as John Harrison opens fire on Starfleet Headquarters and kills Captain Pike. Admiral Marcus then reinstates Captain Kirk and instructs him to take his crew and the Enterprise to hunt down Harrison on the Klingon planet of Kronos and basically start imminent war by shooting photon torpedoes to kill Harrison. Kirk follows orders and takes the crew to Kronos where their engines are damaged and they are forced to move on a small transport vessel where they are ambushed by Klingons. Harrison arrives and immediately surrenders after discovering how many torpedoes the Enterprise holds.
This is where it got good, imo. When Harrison is on the ship he is subject to a blood sample and a short interrogation by Captain Kirk and Spock. He entices Kirk to listen despite Spock's warnings and Harrison reveals himself as Khan. He elaborates on a plan to rescue his people, who are frozen in the torpedoes, and says Starfleet has imprisoned him and tortured him because he was the only one who awakened from the cryogenic sleep. Just as soon as you feel sympathy for Khan, Spock decides to contact himself (aka, Leonard Nimoy) where he explains that Khan is the most dangerous man he had ever encountered and advised his younger self against dealing with him. Spock asks his older self if he was able to defeat him and the only information we hear is that it was at great cost. In case you didn't know, in The Wrath of Khan Spock is killed by Khan while trying to save Kirk's life. In this instance, Kirk is killed while attempting to save his ship and entire crew and Spock goes after Khan to seek revenge for killing his friend. In other words, Spock was using his half-human side for a bit.
The thing that I did like about Khan is how they made him seem like an asset despite never losing his madness. When he made it onto the Starfleet warship with Admiral Marcus is when Captain Kirk truly realized that they had just helped Khan and he in fact did not help them at all. I also think Spock makes one badass captain and definitely outsmarted Khan in the end by using full logic and truth. I think that Benedict Cumberbatch was by far one of the best villains I have ever witnessed on film. The way he played the character was incredible. The way he played off the other actors was just a joy to watch.
There were some problems, though. They are pretty small and from what I have seen on the internet so far a majority of die hard Star Trek fans do not like Star Trek Into Darkness. Here is what I noticed:
1. Why did Chekov get promoted to Engineering? Why not promote a crew member who is actually in Engineering?
2. Why not just beam Spock into the volcano in the first place? Actually while we are at it, what was the point of that entire first scene? If it was just to show that Spock was willing to die to get the job done they could have done that another way without these weird crusty looking creatures on a planet with red foliage.
3. Bones (Karl Urban) was nothing but comic relief.
4. Lack of real importance for Sulu other than his brief acting Captain moment.
5. How did Admiral Marcus keep the giant combat ship and Khan and his frozen pals a secret from his own organization?
It is things like this that could potentially ruin the movie for people and I can see and understand that. I chose to not turn into a total sci-fi nerd and just enjoy the movie and I really did. Star Trek Into Darkness is a great sci-fi movie, but I can see where the problems lie and that J.J. Abrams was basically playing house with the characters he had at his disposal without really paying attention to the rather extensive library of Star Trek episodes and movies that have already happened. I kind of fear what he will do with Star Wars Episode VII now.
I was excited for Star Trek Into Darkness, despite the dumb title, for the sheer fact that I have grown up watching Star Trek. I wouldn't describe myself as a "trekkie" but I do know the storylines and have seen just about every TV show and movie thanks to my father. I also really enjoyed J.J. Abrams' first Star Trek film back in 2009. I chose to avoid a majority of trailers and teasers for the sheer fact that buzz about the plot and characters started very early. There were rumors circulating about exactly who John Harrison was starting directly after the Super Bowl teaser if I remember correctly. I just didn't want the crap so I chose to stay away from it the best I could. This is one case where I am happy I did because from the trailers I did see, they focus on the first half hour or so of the movie and ignore the best parts and I loved that.
And just to say, this will have spoilers so beware. The big reveal of who John Harrison is was in the trailer and people called it, but you might want to skip this if you haven't seen Star Trek Into Darkness yet.
So in case you know nothing about Star Trek, didn't catch it in the trailer, or whatever else... John Harrison is Khan.
In case you didn't know or need some catch up, Khan is a genetically engineered tyrant who escaped a 15-year exile by Captain Kirk and returned to seek revenge. The history according to Star Trek Into Darkness is he was the leader of a genetically altered race who tried to conquer Earth and wipe out whoever they deemed inferior. The plot of the 1982 film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan basically followed the USS Enterprise in an attempt to stop Khan from acquiring Genesis, a powerful terraforming device. The Wrath of Khan is generally referred to as the best of the Star Trek films and is credited with renewing interest in the Star Trek story after a lackluster Star Trek motion picture in 1979.
Now back to business... This story arc for Star Trek Into Darkness is a bit confusing and I had to talk to my dad after the movie was over. It basically takes you before the "Space Seed" episode where Khan first appeared or just shifts into an alternate Star Trek universe and replaced "Space Seed."
Basically we start as Captain Kirk is relieved of his duties as Captain of the USS Enterprise after compromising Spock's life and defying Starfleet protocols. After an attack on a Starfleet archives building in London, Kirk is shifted to Captain Pike's command as First Officer of the Enterprise and Spock was ordered as First Officer to another ship. While in a meeting in San Francisco, the fugitive known as John Harrison opens fire on Starfleet Headquarters and kills Captain Pike. Admiral Marcus then reinstates Captain Kirk and instructs him to take his crew and the Enterprise to hunt down Harrison on the Klingon planet of Kronos and basically start imminent war by shooting photon torpedoes to kill Harrison. Kirk follows orders and takes the crew to Kronos where their engines are damaged and they are forced to move on a small transport vessel where they are ambushed by Klingons. Harrison arrives and immediately surrenders after discovering how many torpedoes the Enterprise holds.
This is where it got good, imo. When Harrison is on the ship he is subject to a blood sample and a short interrogation by Captain Kirk and Spock. He entices Kirk to listen despite Spock's warnings and Harrison reveals himself as Khan. He elaborates on a plan to rescue his people, who are frozen in the torpedoes, and says Starfleet has imprisoned him and tortured him because he was the only one who awakened from the cryogenic sleep. Just as soon as you feel sympathy for Khan, Spock decides to contact himself (aka, Leonard Nimoy) where he explains that Khan is the most dangerous man he had ever encountered and advised his younger self against dealing with him. Spock asks his older self if he was able to defeat him and the only information we hear is that it was at great cost. In case you didn't know, in The Wrath of Khan Spock is killed by Khan while trying to save Kirk's life. In this instance, Kirk is killed while attempting to save his ship and entire crew and Spock goes after Khan to seek revenge for killing his friend. In other words, Spock was using his half-human side for a bit.
The thing that I did like about Khan is how they made him seem like an asset despite never losing his madness. When he made it onto the Starfleet warship with Admiral Marcus is when Captain Kirk truly realized that they had just helped Khan and he in fact did not help them at all. I also think Spock makes one badass captain and definitely outsmarted Khan in the end by using full logic and truth. I think that Benedict Cumberbatch was by far one of the best villains I have ever witnessed on film. The way he played the character was incredible. The way he played off the other actors was just a joy to watch.
There were some problems, though. They are pretty small and from what I have seen on the internet so far a majority of die hard Star Trek fans do not like Star Trek Into Darkness. Here is what I noticed:
1. Why did Chekov get promoted to Engineering? Why not promote a crew member who is actually in Engineering?
2. Why not just beam Spock into the volcano in the first place? Actually while we are at it, what was the point of that entire first scene? If it was just to show that Spock was willing to die to get the job done they could have done that another way without these weird crusty looking creatures on a planet with red foliage.
3. Bones (Karl Urban) was nothing but comic relief.
4. Lack of real importance for Sulu other than his brief acting Captain moment.
5. How did Admiral Marcus keep the giant combat ship and Khan and his frozen pals a secret from his own organization?
It is things like this that could potentially ruin the movie for people and I can see and understand that. I chose to not turn into a total sci-fi nerd and just enjoy the movie and I really did. Star Trek Into Darkness is a great sci-fi movie, but I can see where the problems lie and that J.J. Abrams was basically playing house with the characters he had at his disposal without really paying attention to the rather extensive library of Star Trek episodes and movies that have already happened. I kind of fear what he will do with Star Wars Episode VII now.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
J.J. Abrams to direct Star Wars Episode VII
I guess Abrams coming out and stating he had no interest in being part of the new Star Wars trilogy and would "rather be in the audience" was a farce... or a ploy for more money.
Anyway, it has been confirmed that J.J. Abrams (Star Trek, Lost) will be directing Star Wars Episode VII after all. Abrams has come out on top of a rather long list of potential directors, including Zack Snyder, and is now one of the top honchos behind two of the most popular sci-fi franchises. The other, of course, being Star Trek. Abrams is the newest confirmation for this new trilogy. Other people on board are writer Michael Arndt who is writing the screenplay for Episode VII and writers Lawrence Kasdan and Simon Kinberg who are writing screenplays for future Star Wars films and/or spinoffs.
Another rumor regarding Zack Snyder is that he will be involved with a Star Wars spinoff film set to take place in the same universe as Episode VII.
[UPDATE 1/26] It is now official that Abrams is directing. Disney and Lucasfilm made the official announcement and George Lucas has released a comment about it.
I am currently shaking my head as I think this has gone way too far already and we haven't even started. I would like to be excited about Abrams being involved but we all saw what happened with Lost. The guy isn't perfect. I also think Disney's involvement is going to slice Star Wars' right hand off for me. They won't do anything but milk it for all it's worth and that is a true shame. As a big Star Wars fan I should be super excited for this and should have been excited since they announced a new trilogy was coming, but I still haven't found that happy place with this. If there are more Jar Jar type characters and purple lightsabers, or God forbid Jar Jar Binks and/or the Gungans comes back... I quit.
Anyway, it has been confirmed that J.J. Abrams (Star Trek, Lost) will be directing Star Wars Episode VII after all. Abrams has come out on top of a rather long list of potential directors, including Zack Snyder, and is now one of the top honchos behind two of the most popular sci-fi franchises. The other, of course, being Star Trek. Abrams is the newest confirmation for this new trilogy. Other people on board are writer Michael Arndt who is writing the screenplay for Episode VII and writers Lawrence Kasdan and Simon Kinberg who are writing screenplays for future Star Wars films and/or spinoffs.
Another rumor regarding Zack Snyder is that he will be involved with a Star Wars spinoff film set to take place in the same universe as Episode VII.
[UPDATE 1/26] It is now official that Abrams is directing. Disney and Lucasfilm made the official announcement and George Lucas has released a comment about it.
"I’ve consistently been impressed with J.J. as a filmmaker and storyteller. He’s an ideal choice to direct the new Star Wars film and the legacy couldn’t be in better hands."
I am currently shaking my head as I think this has gone way too far already and we haven't even started. I would like to be excited about Abrams being involved but we all saw what happened with Lost. The guy isn't perfect. I also think Disney's involvement is going to slice Star Wars' right hand off for me. They won't do anything but milk it for all it's worth and that is a true shame. As a big Star Wars fan I should be super excited for this and should have been excited since they announced a new trilogy was coming, but I still haven't found that happy place with this. If there are more Jar Jar type characters and purple lightsabers, or God forbid Jar Jar Binks and/or the Gungans comes back... I quit.
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
J.J. Abrams declines Star Wars: Episode VII
It was announced that J.J. Abrams declined the offer to direct Star Wars: Episode VII back in November, but now we know that he not only entertained the idea but was in early conversations with Kathleen Kennedy to direct. However, Abrams now revealed that he initially turned down the offer because of his loyalty to Star Trek.
I'm not really bummed that Abrams is out of the picture for Star Wars. I can't really pinpoint why, but the idea bothered me.
“I quickly said that because of my loyalty to Star Trek, and also just being a fan, I wouldn’t even want to be involved in the next version of those things. I declined any involvement very early on. I’d rather be in the audience not knowing what was coming, rather than being involved in the minutiae of making them.”
I'm not really bummed that Abrams is out of the picture for Star Wars. I can't really pinpoint why, but the idea bothered me.
Monday, December 10, 2012
Star Trek Into Darnkess villain revealed
There has been much speculation about the villain to be in Star Trek Into Darkness. All we have known so far is that the villain is played by Benedict Cumberbatch. We now have confirmation via an image released by Paramount Pictures that Cumberbatch's character is named John Harrison.
I don't know too much about the whole Star Trek universe so the name honestly doesn't ring a bell for me. However, I heard quite a few people, including my boyfriend, tell me that some of the images from the trailer we got last week have a strong tie-in or foreshadow to Wrath of Khan. I have no idea what the hell is in store for this movie but I am excited.
I don't know too much about the whole Star Trek universe so the name honestly doesn't ring a bell for me. However, I heard quite a few people, including my boyfriend, tell me that some of the images from the trailer we got last week have a strong tie-in or foreshadow to Wrath of Khan. I have no idea what the hell is in store for this movie but I am excited.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Star Trek Into Darkness - Official Teaser Trailer
We finally have the first teaser for Star Trek Into Darkness. I enjoyed the hell out of JJ Abrams' Star Trek despite not being a big "Trekkie" but I am excited for this one. Not to mention it looks a lot better than the first.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Official synopsis for Star Trek Into Darkness
We now have the official synopsis for the upcoming Star Trek sequel, Star Trek Into Darkness. It is as follows:
Star Trek Into Darkness is set to hit theaters on May 17, 2013. It will be released in 2D, 3D, and IMAX formats.
"When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis.
With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction.
As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew."
Star Trek Into Darkness is set to hit theaters on May 17, 2013. It will be released in 2D, 3D, and IMAX formats.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
Star Trek 2 official title revealed
JJ Abrams has revealed the official title for the upcoming Star Trek sequel. The title is Star Trek Into the Darkness... 3D.
This title sounds dumb, imo.
This title sounds dumb, imo.
Friday, February 24, 2012
First images for Star Trek 2
My boyfriend likes Star Trek a lot more than I do, but what the hell. I did enjoy the first one a lot.
Why hello Mr. Spock. <3
http://collider.com/star-trek-2-movie-image-set-photo/147767/
Why hello Mr. Spock. <3
http://collider.com/star-trek-2-movie-image-set-photo/147767/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


